1. A way of knowing about
the natural world using a process designed to reduce the chance of being misled.
2. Process:
- Observation
- Go see your friend's
fish pond to confirm the absence of fish, etc.
- Question
- Ask, "Why have
my neighbor's fish died in the pond?"
- Literature Review
- Read the literature
to find out the survival requirements for the fish that were in your neighbor's
pond and to find out about past reasons fish have died in ponds.
- Multiple Hypotheses
- Come up with as many
possible answers to the question as you can.
- The water was
not the right temperature, there was not enough oxygen, there was
not enough food, over-harvesting by your neighbor or predators, toxins,
etc.
- Deductions
- For each hypothesis,
determine what evidence (data) would be required to refute the hypothesis
or support the hypothesis.
- Example: The
water temperature must be below 40 degrees or above 90 degrees to
kill the fish.
- Tests
- Collect the actual
data
- Example: The
water temperature in the pond was always between 71 and 82 degrees.
- Tentative Conclusions
- Report your methods
and results and state which hypotheses seem to be supported and which
you were able to rule out tentatively.
- Example: Water
temperature most likely was not the cause of the fish dieoff.
- Peer Review
- Submit your report
to a scientific journal. The journal editors give your report to scientists
who critique the scientific soundness and merits of your report.
3. Rules
- Maximize Sample Size
- Collect data from
as large a sample as possible and needed based on the population's variability
and the amount of certainty required.
- Example: if you
want to know the average height of PCC students, you can't just measure
the height of 10 students, measure the height of 1000s.
- Representative Sample
- Choose the sample
you are going to study randomly or systematically to avoid bias.
- Example: if you
want to know the average height of PCC students, you can't just measure
the height of all the basketball players, you need to measure the height of students representing as much of the variability as possible.
- Controlled Studies
- Use when determining
the cause of an effect.
- Always have a
control group to compare to the experimental group and always have
just one variable be different between the control group and the experimental
group at a time so you can be more sure that any effects seen in the
experimental group that are not seen in the control group likely arose
from that particular cause.
|